<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Virtual PCs and Carbon Footprints</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.principia-it.co.uk/2010/01/06/virtual-pcs-and-carbon-footprints/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.principia-it.co.uk/2010/01/06/virtual-pcs-and-carbon-footprints/</link>
	<description>Power from Simplicity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:49:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Bools</title>
		<link>http://blog.principia-it.co.uk/2010/01/06/virtual-pcs-and-carbon-footprints/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Bools]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 11:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.principia-it.co.uk/?p=466#comment-118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alan:

I should think there are several approaches to measuring any individual&#039;s carbon footprint e.g. http://carbontrust.co.uk and http://actonco2.direct.gov.uk (and they will probably all produce different results). In my original post I was more concerned with the overheads companies could save rather than the cost of remote working &lt;em&gt;per se&lt;/em&gt;. What you are looking for is the differences between travelling to work compared to working from home or a local office. Car travel being the major one. Remote workers still use some energy to heat, light and power equipment but in most cases I suggest they will be heating homes anyway and the power requirements for the computer and lighting are certainly no more in a domestic environment compared to central office.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan:</p>
<p>I should think there are several approaches to measuring any individual&#8217;s carbon footprint e.g. <a href="http://carbontrust.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://carbontrust.co.uk</a> and <a href="http://actonco2.direct.gov.uk" rel="nofollow">http://actonco2.direct.gov.uk</a> (and they will probably all produce different results). In my original post I was more concerned with the overheads companies could save rather than the cost of remote working <em>per se</em>. What you are looking for is the differences between travelling to work compared to working from home or a local office. Car travel being the major one. Remote workers still use some energy to heat, light and power equipment but in most cases I suggest they will be heating homes anyway and the power requirements for the computer and lighting are certainly no more in a domestic environment compared to central office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alan</title>
		<link>http://blog.principia-it.co.uk/2010/01/06/virtual-pcs-and-carbon-footprints/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[alan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 10:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.principia-it.co.uk/?p=466#comment-117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[interseting read, however how can you measure individual carbon footprint for remote workers? how ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interseting read, however how can you measure individual carbon footprint for remote workers? how ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

